Story covered in Private Eye: Issue #1297

See this tweet:

Full article here.

There are some inaccuracies in this article, including the timing of CRB check request and the adjustments to lighting requested/offered. Fails to mention disability discrimination aspects of ruling. Read this blog for a more accurate account of what happened.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s